Stability testing for applications for variations to a marketing authorisation; revision 3 – EMA

Author
Published on
Category
Updates

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has published Revision 3 of the Guideline on Stability Testing for Applications for Variations to a Marketing Authorisation (EMA/CHMP/QWP/441071/2011-Rev.3), which will come into legal effect on 15 January 2026. This update replaces Revision 2 and reflects the evolving expectations for stability testing in the context of post-approval changes to human medicinal products.

The updated guideline introduces clearer, risk-based, science-driven stability expectations for variation submissions:

Enhanced Scope and Clarity

The guideline outlines the stability data required for Type IA, IB and Type II variations with a stronger focus on scientific justification. Its application is limited to human medicines (chemical active substances, finished products, herbal substances) and excludes biologicals, radiopharmaceuticals, and biotechnology-derived products. Veterinary products have a separate, newer guideline (EMA/CVMP/QWP/515653/2023)

Risk-Based Stability Strategies

Applicants must evaluate whether a proposed change might impact the product’s stability profile. When risk exists, data should demonstrate that quality is maintained throughout the approved shelf-life. This emphasis on risk and science aligns more closely with ICH principles and modern regulatory expectations.

Comparative and Commitment Studies

For Type II variations (major changes), comparative stability data (long-term and accelerated) are expected to show that the post-change product performs consistently with pre-change data. Commitment batches, especially the first production batch post-change, must be placed on documented long-term stability studies spanning the full shelf-life.

Ongoing Obligations and Reporting

Stability testing supporting a variation application must continue through the entire approved shelf-life or retest period. Any out-of-specification results or concerning trends should be reported promptly to regulators.

This revision encourages consistency and scientific justification in how companies demonstrate product stability after post-approval changes. Key practical impacts include: Stronger comparability requirements for stability data in variation dossiers. Clearer expectations on what data regulators expect across different types of changes. Continued lifecycle management focus, stability evidence now plays an even greater role in post-approval quality assurance.

Marketing Authorisation Holders and Regulatory Affairs teams should review their variation strategies and stability programs to ensure alignment ahead of the implementation date.

Connect with us to explore how we can support you and help optimize the stability program of your products. Contact us directly by mailing your enquiry to [email protected] or visiting our website https://www.starodub.nl/

Explore Starodub updates

Reflecting on Human Medicines in 2025, European Medicines Agency

Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Drug Development

Happy Holidays

Cornelis Jansma
Senior RA Consultant
Cornelis Jansma

Let's Connect

Talk to an expert